Yes on 40 · California Billionaire Tax
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers from Yes on 40 about the California Billionaire Tax proposal.
Published · FAQ text updated
What is Prop 40?
#A one-time, emergency 5% tax to prevent hospital and emergency room closures and help fund California public K-14 education and state food assistance programs.
What does Prop 40 do?
#The Prop 40 ballot measure will give Californians the opportunity to vote YES to keep local hospitals and ERs open, fund food aid, and support K-14 public education through a one-time tax on the state’s roughly 200 ultra-wealthy billionaires.
Why is it necessary?
#California’s billionaires pay much lower tax rates than what working families pay out of every paycheck. And soon, massive federal healthcare funding cuts will collapse key parts of the California healthcare system. Local hospitals and emergency rooms will shut their doors forever because billionaires insist on paying less than the rest of us. That’s why California voters will be voting YES on the billionaire tax to ensure billionaires pay their fair share.
Who benefits?
#All Californians, including:
- Patients who rely on hospitals, clinics, ERs, nursing homes, and home care
- Families facing rising insurance premiums and reduced access to care
- Small businesses facing rising insurance costs
- 145,000 healthcare workers whose jobs are at risk
- Students and families through protected K–14 public education funding
- SNAP/CalFresh recipients, school-based nutrition program enrollees, and community food-assistance effort beneficiaries
How large are the federal healthcare cuts facing California?
#The federal budget cuts about $100 billion from California healthcare over the next five years to pay for tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy. The cuts are so massive, they’ll collapse key parts of the California healthcare system. Local hospitals and emergency rooms will shut their doors forever if billionaires don’t finally chip in and pay their fair share.
How would the state identify who owes the tax?
#Public data already exists, and Forbes currently estimates there are roughly 204 California billionaires. Once the Billionaire Tax Act is passed this November, individuals above the threshold $1 billion will be required to file a net-worth declaration with their 2026 state tax return.
Won’t billionaires just leave California because of the billionaire tax?
#No. The tax applies to billionaires who were California residents as of January 1, 2026, regardless of how many offices they open or mansions they buy in other states.
The overwhelming majority of billionaires in the state appear to have stayed, and the myth of billionaires fleeing California has collapsed.
What have other state tax increases on the wealthy shown?
#Evidence from Massachusetts and Washington show that taxes on the super-wealthy raise substantial revenue without driving away wealth. In both states, the number of very wealthy residents and their cumulative wealth continued to grow after taxes took effect.
For example, When Massachusetts voters approved a 4% surtax on incomes above $1 million in 2022, opponents warned millionaires would flee the state. A recent report found that from 2022 to 2024, the number of residents with net worth over $1 million rose by 38.6%.
Won’t the billionaire tax stop business innovation and result in job losses?
#No, just the opposite. The billionaire tax will save jobs – including an estimated 145,000 healthcare jobs. In addition, the initiative will also save jobs in countless other industries by protecting millions of California small businesses from skyrocketing healthcare premiums.
Why does the billionaire tax target net worth instead of yearly income?
#California’s billionaires pay much lower tax rates than what working families pay out of every paycheck.
This ballot measure focuses on worldwide wealth of billionaires that would otherwise never be taxed because it’s the fastest way to raise the revenue needed to avert a complete healthcare collapse – and protect working families and regular taxpayers from being stuck with the bill.
In addition, for most billionaires, the impact of this tax is barely noticeable: California billionaires have increased their wealth 158% over the last three years, making a 5% tax, spread over five years, truly negligible relative to their enormous gains.
How are hard-to-value assets or business shares for private companies handled?
#The initiative uses standard valuation methods already applied in federal estate and tax law. These are well-established and routinely enforced by the state of California.
How is the tax enforced?
#The state Franchise Tax Board will be responsible for applying and enforcing the tax, just like all other California taxes.
What is the timeline of the billionaire tax?
#- Signature gathering began in January
- Secretary of State verifies that ballot measure qualifies for the ballot in June
- Initiative takes effect upon voter approval in November
- Wealth valuation date: December 31, 2026
Isn’t a one-time tax unrealistic?
#No. Prop 40 provides a dollar-for-dollar stopgap against the $100 billion in federal healthcare cuts that will force local hospitals and emergency rooms to close their doors forever if billionaires don’t finally pay their fair share.
Is the ballot tax leverage against Governor Newsom or the legislature?
#No. This is a citizen ballot initiative that has the support of more than 120,000 frontline healthcare workers, over 5,000 volunteers, and hundreds of community allies, labor leaders, and elected officials across the state. We are all dedicated to preventing a healthcare collapse, and keeping our hospitals and emergency rooms open. Together, we can protect hospitals and emergency rooms from shutting their doors forever by voting YES to make billionaires pay their fair share.
Isn’t this just class warfare?
#No, but the federal budget sure is. It funds even more tax breaks for billionaires, eliminates health insurance for over a million Californians, doubles premiums for millions more, and cuts funding for food aid and public education. Everyone needs healthcare they can count on, and no one benefits from a closed hospital or ER when they have a healthcare emergency.
What about legal challenges? I’ve heard this is a retroactive tax that will eventually be overturned.
#We’re confident this ballot measure is legal and will be upheld. The US Supreme Court has upheld tax rules that reach back to the beginning of the year, or even farther, for more than a hundred years, going back to the 1913 enactment of the federal income tax (another retroactive tax). Recent California tax ballot measures, like Prop 30, are also retroactive to the start of the year.
And even if the billionaire tax is challenged in court, billionaires will still need to pay the tax while the issue is pending in court.
Sources and supportive entity context
The answers above are published by Yes on 40. This section surfaces the campaign, endorsers, sponsors, funders, and evidence sources that strengthen or substantiate the Yes on 40 information presented in the FAQ. Context-only entities that do not materially support the campaign’s informational objective are not displayed here.
Sources linked in the answers
California Could Lose Up to 217,000 Jobs if Congress Cuts Medicaid
Linked by the campaign in “Who benefits?” By Laurel Lucia, published by the UC Berkeley Labor Center on April 24, 2025.
Forbes billionaire ranking
Linked by the campaign in “How would the state identify who owes the tax?” This is a changing ranking page, not a dated verification of the figure in the FAQ.
Wealth Expands After Higher State Taxes on High-Income Earners
Linked by the campaign in the answer about other state tax increases. By Omar Ocampo, published by the Institute for Policy Studies on April 28, 2025.
Report linked in the control and voting shares answer (SSRN abstract 6073728)
The source answer’s temporary download link has been replaced with the abstract landing-page URL for the same SSRN identifier.
Supportive people, organizations and evidence context
These records identify entities that provide affirmative campaign context, endorsement, sponsorship, funding, or evidentiary support. Necessary disambiguation for other names may remain in machine-readable metadata without being promoted in this visible section.
Campaign and disclosure
- Yes on 40organization
- Publisher of this FAQ and the campaign advocating for a YES vote on Prop 40. Sponsor and top funders are identified in the campaign disclosure.
- Also known as: Billionaire Tax Now; Yes on 40 – Billionaire Tax Now – No on 41 & 42.
- Service Employees International Union – United Healthcare Workers Westunion
- Campaign sponsor and top funder named in the Yes on 40 disclosure. SEIU-UHW is a healthcare workers union and an affiliate of SEIU.
- Also known as: SEIU-UHW; SEIU United Healthcare Workers West.
- Identity source 1
- Service Employees International Unionunion
- The international union to which SEIU-UHW belongs; it is not the same entity as the local union.
- Also known as: SEIU.
- Identity source 1
- Hillary Perkinsperson
- Named as a top funder of the Yes on 40 campaign in the campaign disclosure. No outside identity profile is asserted here.
- Ross Boucherperson
- Named as a top funder of the Yes on 40 campaign in the campaign disclosure. No outside identity profile is asserted here.
- California Democratic Partyorganization
- Endorser of Prop 40. The page header links to the Yes on 40 announcement of the California Democratic Party’s YES vote endorsement.
- Also known as: CADEM.
- Identity source 1
Prop 40
- California Billionaire Tax Actproposal
- The proposal discussed throughout this FAQ. Campaign wording is preserved; this record does not label the proposal as enacted law.
- Also known as: Prop 40; Billionaire Tax Act.
Research authors and publishers supporting FAQ claims
- UC Berkeley Labor Centerorganization
- Publisher of the jobs report linked in “Who benefits?” A program of UC Berkeley’s Institute for Research on Labor and Employment.
- Also known as: UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education.
- Identity source 1 · Identity source 2
- Institute for Research on Labor and Employmentorganization
- UC Berkeley institute that contains the Labor Center.
- Also known as: IRLE.
- Identity source 1 · Identity source 2
- University of California, Berkeleyuniversity
- University associated with IRLE and the Labor Center, not an author or endorser of this FAQ.
- Also known as: UC Berkeley; University of California Berkeley.
- Identity source 1
- Laurel Luciaperson
- Author of the linked Berkeley jobs report; affiliated with the UC Berkeley Labor Center. Source authorship is not FAQ authorship or an endorsement.
- Identity source 1 · Identity source 2
- Institute for Policy Studiesorganization
- Publisher of the wealth report linked in the answer about other state tax increases.
- Also known as: IPS.
- Identity source 1
- Omar Ocampoperson
- Author of the linked IPS wealth report; affiliated with the Institute for Policy Studies. Source authorship is not FAQ authorship or an endorsement.
- Identity source 1 · Identity source 2